We’re living in a time that signals the beginning of a new era of expansionism from an unlikely aggressor: the United States of America.
Renaming shared bodies of water, such as the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America to exert power and influence; threats to claim operational control over the Panama Canal to dictate international trade routes; attempts to enter a deal to annex sovereignly governed territories like Greenland and Canada in exchange for natural resources and land rights; and holding the security and livelihoods of millions in the balance in exchange for beachfront property in Gaza or rare minerals in Ukraine are examples of the new American aggression. It’s a stark reversal from promoting freedom and independence around the world.
Power through aggression is addictive because it insists on the thrill of warring against an enemy—real or perceived.
We didn’t get here without provocation. Global events and a resurgence of nationalistic sentiments have stoked anxiety among many. Look no further than Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and China’s expansionistic endeavors in the Asia Pacific. These two superpowers are examples of authoritarian, non-democratic, regimes doing what they do best: compete, intimidate, and win because they are driven by a thirst for power at nearly any cost.
Power through aggression is addictive because it insists on the thrill of warring against an enemy—real or perceived. To fight, win, and dominate is how it legitimizes its existence. From competitive sports to existential threats, without a legitimate fight, the energy created by a quest for power grows restless. It demands either a new battle or to convert its energy into a new form of being.
It’s a well-worn story. Aggression and expansionism are destined to collapse following their self-serving gains. In every system, growth has a mathematical curve where returns ultimately diminish, sometimes at catastrophic rates once their peak has been reached. Resources run out, economies go bankrupt, species go extinct, ecosystems collapse, or the people revolt under pressure, mismanagement, and hardship. This is a predictable future that doesn’t require a crystal ball or spiritual prophet. It’s the inevitability when power through aggression is emboldened to shape the future.
But power is not limited to aggression. There is another force at work in the universe: power through humility. It transcends our contentious and hostile impulses beyond a binary choice between the strong and weak. It does not seek dominance or a competitive edge. Instead, this power is a force of strength and confidence defined by peace over violence; mercy over aggression; sacrifice over superiority.
Power through humility is an old idea with fresh relevance for this moment.
Power through humility is an old idea with fresh relevance for this moment. For example, the Civil Rights movement was built on the ideals of mutual brotherhood, non-violence, equal rights, and racial reconciliation. Leaders of the movement took their inspiration from the likes of Mahatma Gandhi of India and Jesus of Nazareth. They, and the movements they led, tapped into a power greater than the impulsive confrontational, violent tactics of their time. Theirs was a power marked by mercy, belonging, purpose, and eternity. This power is superhuman because it’s a cosmic strength with a universal love for humanity.
Power energized from love is constructive, not destructive. It’s invitational, not exclusionary. It’s progressive, not regressive. It’s collaborative, and not competitive. Desires through aggression are short-sighted. Hope through humility and love is everlasting.
Instead of expanding our borders, let us be a people known for expanding our hearts.




2 responses to “From Aggression to Humility: Rethinking Power”
While I couldn’t agree more with the spirit of your message, I do question the effectiveness of an approach that is singularly directed at humility, particularly on the world stage. While I would agree that this approach is best in our day to day lives, I wonder how it would function in practice when dealing with malevolent actors both home and abroad. It seems to me that leaders must at times toe the line of humble and aggressive depending on the circumstances. My best effort at describing it would be that humility should be our default setting, but aggression should be a tool in our arsenal. Having said this, what happens when half of the country feels like that tool is under utilized? It preps them for the reality we find ourselves in now where the leaders default is aggression. Like everything else in life we are stuck on a pendulum, swinging from left to right on all issues. In a perfect world we would follow the example of so many spiritual leaders in the past and “be still”, perfectly in the middle understanding both sides of every issue, but that is not realistic. Our leaders are supposed to be in place not to stop the swing but slow it, and make it less extreme, but with improperly placed incentive structures we find that to not be realistic as well. At this point it is hard to not see the future as being very bleak as there is no sings of stoping, or even slowing the swing.
I agree. Balance is required and vital to our surival. At some point lines are drawn and threats become real. Humility as a “default setting” is great way of framing it. My call is for more of that in our discord and everyday state of being. Humility is often mistaken for passivity, instead of modesty in action. The solution to aggression is not apathy, but as you suggest, to courageously engage in the issues to prevent the extremes from becoming reality. I so appreciate your thoughts and engagement!